<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Minds at stake: Generative AI, epistemic power, and the competition for knowledge</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>341</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>346</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">106467</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.412464.1242</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ehsan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahghasemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence as a primary interface for information-seeking has introduced a new and underexplored dimension of power in contemporary societies. As hundreds of millions of users worldwide increasingly turn to large language models for answers to everyday questions, the corporations that develop and deploy these systems have gained an unprecedented capacity to shape what people know, how they reason, and whose version of the world prevails. Drawing on Shoshana Zuboff&#039;s theory of surveillance capitalism and Michel Foucault&#039;s analytics of power/knowledge, this article argues that the competition among major technology firms in the generative AI sector is not merely commercial but fundamentally epistemic. Through a review of recent empirical data on AI adoption and a critical analysis of market concentration, the article demonstrates that a small number of corporate actors— operating with limited public accountability and considerable opacity— are consolidating control over the epistemic infrastructure of daily life. This concentration reproduces and deepens existing asymmetries of knowledge, raising urgent questions for democratic governance. The article concludes by calling for the reconceptualisation of AI information systems as public epistemic infrastructure, subject to transparency requirements, independent auditing, and democratic oversight.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Algorithmic Authority</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">epistemic power</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Generative Artificial Intelligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Knowledge Governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">surveillance capitalism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_106467_8b8a20f19b963dad47d15dc1fb60af77.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Child's digital communications: A study of the kidfluencer phenomenon in cyberspace, focusing on the YouTube platform and the unboxing genre</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>347</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>369</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105996</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.408825.1220</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeid Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ameli</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of Communications and Global Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Azam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ravadrad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bicharanlou</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Milad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mousavi Haghshenas</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Background: Four of the top ten subscribed YouTube channels feature child-centric content, with three belonging to kidfluencers whose videos are dubbed in fourteen languages. By mid-2025, these four channels collectively garnered 608 million subscribers, demonstrating the phenomenon&#039;s significance in the digital sphere.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This article utilizes the Dual-Spacization of the World paradigm and a qualitative approach (combining participatory observation and documentary analysis focused on YouTube and the popular unboxing genre) to describe the kidfluencer phenomenon, its links to digital commerce and economy, and its cultural consequences on child development and socialization.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;The second part offers a local interpretation of this global trend by analyzing thirteen semi-structured interviews with children and adolescents (aged six to fourteen).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The analysis confirmed the interviewees&#039; positive alignment with kidfluencing through four key themes: &quot;Spectacular Consumption and the Spectacularization of Consumption&quot;, &quot;Perceiving Kidfluencers as Independent and Validating Them&quot;, &quot;Expert Users, Potential Producers&quot; and &quot;Kidfluencing: A Path to Fame, a Shortcut to Wealth&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The study’s findings recommend that, to maximize opportunities, supportive legislation and regulatory bodies should actively back children’s agency and capabilities in digital environments, while simultaneously promoting the development of spatial literacy and enhancement of children’s digital literacy through national and global programs and policies.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Digital economy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">dual-spacization of childhood</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">kidfluencing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">unboxing genre</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">YouTube platform</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105996_49998cb23fa77b1f92181c60b210f5d3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Assessing cybersecurity governance in Nigeria from global perspective: A literature review</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>371</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>392</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">101323</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.391640.1133</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aminu Ola</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rasaq</LastName>
<Affiliation>Centre for Cyberspace Studies, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Monday O.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Adenomon</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Statistics, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Emmanuel S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Chaku</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Computer Science, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Usman</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ibrahim</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Physics, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Nigeria&#039;s rapid digital transformation has led to increased cyber risks, endangering the country&#039;s security and stability. Although various policies and guidelines have been developed on cybersecurity, it is not yet clear how effective they are when compared to global benchmarks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This literature survey compares cybersecurity governance in Nigeria with developed countries, identifies shortcomings and offers recommendations for improvement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Through qualitative data analysis, the study highlights weaknesses in laws and regulations, lack of cybersecurity awareness and training, corruption issues, infrastructure, housing shortages and poor economic integration. Comparing global practices with countries such as the UK, the US and Estonia, the study reveals that Nigeria lags behind in key areas such as law enforcement and the concept of work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Finding:&lt;/strong&gt; The recommendations include reforming the regulatory framework to respond to emerging threats, promoting stronger public-private partnerships, expanding awareness and training, and adopting Recognize global best practices in cybersecurity governance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Improving these aspects will help Nigeria strengthen its ability to defend itself against evolving cyber threats and better align with global standards.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Conceptual Framework</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cybersecurity practices</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">empirical review</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Literature Review</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Telecommunication Union</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Theoretical Framework</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_101323_e17c5f591fd5d21d23d51a62ccb42ca2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A survey examination of psychological support in the workplace</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>393</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>415</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">102845</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.396165.1167</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Toosi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Doctor of Medicine (M.D.), Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mandana</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sajjadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Global Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; This article presents the findings of our specially designed study based on data from the GSS 2022 comprehensive survey. We wanted to investigate the landscape of psychological support in the contemporary American workplace. As the significance of employee well-being grows, organizations recognize the need to provide effective psychological support to foster a healthy work environment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;Our study aimed to evaluate psychological support programs&#039; awareness, availability, utilization, and perceived efficacy in various industries and organizations, particularly in relation to Internet use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;A varied group of American citizens took part in the study, answering questions related to their awareness of available resources, involvement in workplace support initiatives, and the effects on their overall well-being.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; The findings suggest that employees’ perception of psychological support from managers positively influences both work and life satisfaction. However, only a portion of the original hypotheses concerning the relationships between this perception and other variables were supported by the data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Notably, it was discovered that younger individuals tend to perceive less psychological support from management. Additionally, individuals previously married, regardless of their current marital status, were more likely to perceive their managers as psychologically supportive. In addition, those with a higher level of education reported a higher level of perceived employer support. And, balanced daily internet engagement can enhance the perception of support.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Frederick Herzberg</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">managerial psychological support</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">motivation-hygiene theory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stress reduction</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_102845_64f39bbe86e229f03b8d4b60248cdcdf.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Internet infidelity among Iranian users: The role of interpersonal and intrapersonal factors</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>417</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>431</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">103874</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.397028.1171</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Javad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aliakbar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soleimanian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Tayebe</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahimi Pordanjani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The emergence of virtual social networks has facilitated a new form of marital infidelity known as internet infidelity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This study investigated the mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between self-compassion, relationship maintenance behaviors, and attitudes toward internet infidelity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;A cross-sectional study using SEM was conducted among 481 Iranian married users. The data collection was performed using Internet Infidelity, Relationship Maintenance Strategies, Self-Compassion, and Self-Esteem Questionnaires. SEM was used to examine hypothesized relationships, and the bootstrap in Preacher and Hayes’ Macro program was employed for testing mediation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;SEM analysis revealed that self-compassion and relationship maintenance behaviors had a direct effect on both self-esteem and attitudes toward internet infidelity (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&lt; 0.0001). However, the hypothesized mediating role of self-esteem was not supported. These findings underscore the significant influence of self-compassion and relationship maintenance behaviors in predicting attitudes toward internet infidelity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Counseling interventions aimed at fostering self-compassion and reinforcing relationship maintenance skills may help reduce the risk of internet infidelity.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">attitude to internet infidelity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iranian users</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">relationship maintenance behaviors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Self-compassion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">self-esteem</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">social networks</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_103874_40778c1bb7e21f363a1517a53c1bd4b0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reimagining global economy in the age of artificial intelligence: A critical thematic interpretation of The Age of AI and Our Human Future</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>433</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>448</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105005</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.403187.1183</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Roohollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kohanhoosh Nejad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of West Asian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming global economic systems, reshaping labor markets, industries, and geopolitical power structures. &lt;em&gt;The Age of AI and Our Human Future&lt;/em&gt; by Kissinger, Schmidt, and Huttenlocher (2021) offers an influential perspective on these transformations, warranting systematic academic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to examine the major economic and societal themes emerging from &lt;em&gt;The Age of AI and Our Human&lt;/em&gt; Future and to interpret their implications for the future of the world economy in the age of AI.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase thematic analysis, the book was analyzed as the primary qualitative data source. The theoretical framework combined the concept of Disruptive Technologies and Schumacher’s human-centered perspective to interpret how AI influences global economic and ethical structures.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Four key themes were identified: (1) Transformation of Industries, (2) Labor Market Shifts and Economic Inequality, (3) AI and Global Power Dynamics, and (4) Regulation and Ethical Frameworks. The findings show that AI drives innovation and productivity while intensifying inequality and geopolitical competition. Ethical and regulatory frameworks are essential to balance technological progress with social justice and human welfare.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; AI’s rapid development is reshaping the world economy, necessitating interdisciplinary approaches and global cooperation. Human-centered and ethically governed AI development is vital to ensure that technological progress contributes to equitable and sustainable global prosperity.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">artificial intelligence (AI)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">human future</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Kissinger</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Thematic analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">world economy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105005_8af9906896b77938677da2894029a15b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>From Pretoria to Brussels: Expert networks, ethical spillover, and the architecture of EU AI regulation</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>449</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>472</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105007</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.403975.1187</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sabbaghian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rajdeep</FirstName>
					<LastName>Singh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1218-134X</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies become embedded in public and private decision-making, questions of governance have become a critical global concern. The European Union (EU), widely regarded as a leader in digital regulation, has developed an AI governance architecture that includes the AI Act, Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, and multiple stakeholder platforms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This article examines how expert networks and national governance models from France, Germany, and South Africa contribute to the European Union’s artificial intelligence (AI) governance through conceptual, institutional, and procedural spillover.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;The research employs comparative case study analysis, drawing on policy documents, ethical guidelines, expert reports, and process tracing to track how national frameworks migrate into EU deliberations. The theoretical framework integrates spillover theory with multi‑level governance, norm diffusion, and epistemic community perspectives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion: &lt;/strong&gt;The central question is how transnational actors influence EU regulation via mechanisms such as normative transfer, expert mobility, and platform convergence. The study hypothesizes that EU AI governance is increasingly co‑constructed through multidirectional spillover, in which norms and ethical frameworks from both the Global North and Global South are adapted and embedded into supranational regulation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; South Africa’s “Fair AI” framework, France’s participatory ethics inquiry, and Germany’s strategic critique each shape EU debates on trustworthy AI, accountability, and regulatory experimentation. Together, these cases indicate that EU governance functions not as a closed, top‑down system but as a porous and adaptive architecture responsive to external influence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The expert communities across regions contribute to the co‑production of global AI standards, and that ethical pluralism is emerging as a significant feature of supranational regulation.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">AI governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Epistemic Communities</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Multi-Level Governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">norm diffusion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Spillover effect</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105007_ccfa3ef6f43ce023b23eb3e7c0d8f5d9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Artificial intelligence and the transformation of journalism: A systematic review of opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>473</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>491</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105097</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.406680.1205</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Babak</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dariush</LastName>
<Affiliation>Shaykh Baha al-din Architectural and Environmental Studies Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Faezeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Piriyaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Cinema, Faculty of Cinema &amp; Theater, Tehran University of Art, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;ackground:&lt;/strong&gt; Over the past decade, advances in machine learning, natural language processing, and generative artificial intelligence have enabled news organizations to automate routine reporting tasks, enhance investigative capabilities, and deliver content tailored to increasingly segmented audiences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This paper presents a systematic review of scholarly literature on the integration of AI into journalism, covering studies published between 2010 and 2025.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Drawing on research from diverse geographical contexts and methodological approaches, it synthesizes findings on AI’s technological capabilities, its economic and ethical implications, and its broader societal impact on the news ecosystem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The review identifies AI’s transformative role in automating routine reporting, enhancing investigative journalism, enabling personalized content delivery, and streamlining newsroom operations. However, it also reveals significant concerns regarding transparency, accountability, bias, audience trust, and the erosion of human editorial oversight. The findings highlight regional disparities in adoption, shaped by technological infrastructure, market readiness, and policy environments, underscoring the need for context-sensitive approaches to AI governance. By mapping prevailing trends and identifying underexplored dimensions—such as cross-cultural differences in adoption, long-term effects on democratic deliberation, and evolving newsroom ethics—this study provides an evidence-based foundation for policymakers, media professionals, and researchers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; While AI holds the potential to enhance journalism’s efficiency, reach, and innovation, its responsible implementation requires robust ethical standards, governance frameworks, and sustained human involvement to safeguard the profession’s democratic role.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Artificial Intelligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Journalism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">automated reporting</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">media ethics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">newsroom innovation</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105097_3e4332569040d39fd4043674315720b4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Disinformation as weaponised ignorance: A hybrid teleological–epistemic framework</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>493</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>512</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105499</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.403904.1190</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ramin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rambod</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Philosophy, SR.C. Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hadi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Samadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Philosophy, SR.C. Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Shahla</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eslami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Philosophy, SR.C. Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Contemporary debates on disinformation are dominated by two influential approaches: Fallis’s functional (teleological) model and Simion’s purely epistemic Disinformation as Ignorance-Generating Content (DIGC) model. Their respective strengths and weaknesses become salient in real-world settings such as the Backfire Effect, the spread of bullshit, and disputes about the epistemic status of Large Language Models (LLMs).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;We aim to (i) critically evaluate the explanatory and classificatory utility of the functional and purely epistemic models across these scenarios, (ii) diagnose key failure modes (especially DIGC’s over-generation and the functional model’s difficulties with non-intentional sources), and (iii) propose a more extensionally adequate framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;We conduct a comparative conceptual analysis of both models and test their classifications against several cases. In particular, we use empirical findings on the Backfire Effect to examine whether a purely consequence-based criterion misclassifies accurate, well-intentioned scientific information. We also incorporate Frankfurt’s distinction between lying and bullshit to refine how epistemic malice is characterised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; Fallis’s functional model captures complex forms of disinformation (including true and adaptive disinformation) by tying disinformation to a misleading function, but it struggles to classify outputs from non-intentional sources such as autonomous AI. DIGC broadens coverage by removing intentionality and focusing on dispositions to increase ignorance, yet this purely epistemic stance yields an Over-generation Problem: under Backfire conditions, it can wrongly classify accurate and well-intentioned scientific communication as disinformation. To address these limitations, we propose a hybrid teleological framework, Functional-Contextual Disinformation (FC-DIGC), which combines DIGC’s consequence criterion with a teleological constraint requiring a misleading function. This synthesis better separates malicious deception (disinformation) from unintended epistemic harm (contextually harmful misinformation) and helps clarify how LLM outputs should be categorised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; A hybrid teleological approach improves extensional adequacy by preventing over-generation while retaining coverage for non-intentional systems. FC-DIGC provides a principled way to distinguish disinformation from contextually harmful misinformation and, by integrating the lying–bullshit contrast, captures a broader spectrum of epistemically motivated malice relevant to contemporary information environments, including AI-mediated communication.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">bullshit</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">disinformation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">epistemic authority</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ignorance-generating content</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">intentional misleading</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">knowledge-first epistemology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">LLMs</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105499_43edbbab1c5ea946830e99dd8f77b2b4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Cybernetic semiotics in interactive digital narratives: Toward a semiotic framework for meaning-making in cyberspace with Detroit: Become Human as a case study</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>513</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>534</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105593</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.406313.1198</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Razizadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Media Arts, Religion and Media Faculty, IRIB University, Qom, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Cyberspace has evolved into a vast and intricate cultural ecosystem in which the boundaries between communication, cognition, and creation are constantly being redefined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This study examines how digital interactivity restructures the semiotic logic of narrative meaning-making within contemporary cyberspace, using &lt;em&gt;Detroit: Become Human&lt;/em&gt; as a paradigmatic case of interactive digital narrative. The research aims to determine how multimodal signs, procedural architectures, and player agency interact to produce dynamic and networked processes of semiosis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Through an integrative semiotic framework, encompassing multimodality, interactive agency, and branching narrative design, the analysis demonstrates that meaning in the game emerges not from fixed textual structures but from recursive exchanges between human interpretation and algorithmic responsiveness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The findings reveal that the game’s interactive architecture generates a self-modifying semiotic environment in which choices function as sign-acts that reorganize symbolic patterns across divergent narrative trajectories. This networked mode of signification reflects the broader cultural logic of cyberspace, where meaning is co-created through participatory, decentralized interaction rather than linear authorial transmission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The study concludes that interactive digital narratives constitute a distinctive semiotic paradigm, one that transforms storytelling into a collaborative and cybernetic process of meaning construction. These insights offer a foundation for future research on how digital media, algorithmic systems, and user participation jointly reshape contemporary forms of narrative and cultural signification.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cyberspace studies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Detroit: Become Human</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">interactive digital narrative</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Player agency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Semiotics</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105593_d6bd6bace7294e2b7bfa48984c222400.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Investigating gender stereotypes in Indian YouTube advertisements from 2015 to 2021</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>535</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>553</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105878</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.406277.1197</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Parisa</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ehteshamnia</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of South and East Asian and Oceanian Studies. Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamideh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Molaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of South and East Asian and Oceanian Studies. Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Advertising, which has been defined as, a systematic effort to shape people&#039;s opinions, attitudes and behaviours in a specific direction is a significant part of public communication. Nowadays, video advertisements are among the most important tools to attract different tastes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;It is crucial to examine whether commercial advertisements shape gender stereotypes in a given society.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;This study seeks to examine gender stereotypes in the Indian most watched video advertisements on YouTube from 2015 to 2021 using Barth’s semiotic and Goffman’s dramaturgy approaches.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;There is consistency between the gender of the actor and the voice of the narrator, the way of touching objects, the ritualization of subordination and the type of presence in the family and society as well as licensed withdrawal in Indian video advertisements that have the highest views on YouTube.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The overall result indicates the presence of solid gender stereotypes in advertisements.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">dramaturgy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">gender stereotypes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">India</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">semiotic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">video advertisement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Youtube</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105878_b1906853e80c77c7d5f82d0239ffac0e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Gaming platform monetization models and strategies for startup success: A case study from India</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>555</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>581</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105905</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.404099.1189</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nahid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pourrostami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of South Asian, East Asian and Oceanian Studies, Faculty of Word Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mousavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of American Studies, Faculty of Word Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maziyar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mozaffari Falarti</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of South Asian, East Asian and Oceanian Studies, Faculty of Word Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. dian Studies Department, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sahar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hossein Babaei Mamaghani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of South Asian, East Asian and Oceanian Studies, Faculty of Word Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The evolution of monetization models and marketing approaches in the digital industry has redefined the growth trajectories of startups.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This study explores monetization strategies in India’s gaming startup ecosystem, examining their influence on user behavior, preference, revenue retention and venture capital (VC) attraction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Aligned with a focus on the microstructure of the gaming market, investor behavior, and capital markets, the research employs a mixed-method framework combining interviews, surveys, and MICMAC analysis, grounded in Rational Choice (RC) theory. Using Mobile Premier League (MPL) as a case study, the present research evaluates three monetization models: Real Money Game (RMG), Free-to-Play (F2P), and hybrid strategies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Key findings indicate that RMG significantly enhances user engagement while demonstrating a stronger signaling effect for VC attraction. Empirical results suggest that the RMG monetization strategy offers greater potential for investors decision-making and ensures more robust revenue continuity compared to F2P and hybrid alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The study contributes to the literature by bridging behavioral finance and capital market governance within the context of digital innovation in emerging economies.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Micmac analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mobile gaming in India</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">monetization strategy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rational Choice Theory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">real money gaming</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_105905_b07aa4d75afe91cc725b56c5d8e7ab29.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Typology of the Instagram audiences and users in Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>583</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>614</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">106129</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.408315.1214</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soleimani Sasani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Elham</FirstName>
					<LastName>Akbari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Educational Tecnologhy, Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; With the advent of online social networks, some new form of life was developed in a virtual environment and the relationship among people became different from its traditional form.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;The present study examines the status quo of the use of one of the most popular social networks in Iran, namely Instagram, and the typology of its users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;The data was collected using a questionnaire and almost 1000 Instagram users answered the questions. In order to understand the use of Instagram and the typology of its users, the theoretical concepts of &quot;uses and gratifications&quot;, &quot;transition from audience orientation to user orientation&quot;, &quot;online identity&quot;, &quot;networked individualism&quot; and &quot;cyberloafing&quot; were examined.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The daily use of social networks by users is an average of 139 min, of which approximately 104 min are dedicated to Instagram, and that there was a significant relationship between the use of Instagram and the age group, marital status, and social classes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Instagram users comprise a spectrum from passive consumer actors to active producer actors. Different user types based on the use motives are: instrumental/commercial users (consumer or passive and productive or active), interactive users (social communicator and relationship builder), information seeking users (wide scope information seeking and local scope information seeking), disclosing users (aesthetic and lifestyle), loafing users (tourists and celebrities) and specialty-oriented users.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">media activism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">media consumption</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">social network of Instagram</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Users</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_106129_d796458c2f16aa839c06a4ed1843c7bc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>TikTok’s silent curriculum: How algorithmic content shapes ethical and civic understanding among Nigerian undergraduates</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>615</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>636</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">106189</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.407271.1209</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aderinola Ololade</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dunmade</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Library and Information Science, University of Ilorin Nigeria, Ilorin, Nigeria.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; In the age of algorithmic media, TikTok has become a significant informal learning space for Generation Z, especially in shaping perceptions of ethics, power, and justice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This study examines how final-year Library and Information Science students at the University of Ilorin engage with TikTok’s “silent curriculum”, a set of implicit and emotionally charged lessons embedded in short video content. Guided by informal learning theory, critical media literacy, and research on algorithmic governance, the study investigates how students interpret and absorb ethical and civic messages encountered on the platform.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Using qualitative design, 12 active TikTok users reflected on the platform’s educational influence. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews and digital diaries over four weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The students often encounter content related to social justice, mental health, gender identity, and political commentary, commonly communicated through humour, storytelling, and aesthetic trends. These engagements support reflection and awareness, yet they are shaped by algorithmic patterns that promote particular narratives while limiting others. The study shows that TikTok can serve both as a participatory space for civic learning and as a platform where performative ethics and misinformation circulate. For Library and Information Science students, this raises important questions about their future responsibilities as ethical managers of digital content.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The paper recommends a redesign of digital literacy approaches to include emotional awareness, ethical judgement, and understanding of platform structures. By centring the perspectives of Nigerian Gen Z students, the study adds to knowledge on how digital platforms act as instructional agents in contemporary civic learning.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">algorithmic governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civic engagement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">critical media literacy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">digital diaries</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">informal learning practices</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">generation (Gen Z) Z research</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">platform awareness</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_106189_afa4c770afcd64b5a4ed612dfaf14fb5.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Dual criminality in the digital age: Strengthening cross-border cooperation in cybercrime investigations</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>637</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>661</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">106426</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.402346.1180</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>NSHIMIYIMANA</FirstName>
					<LastName>Francois Regis</LastName>
<Affiliation>Judge (on academic leave), Rwandan Judiciary, Researcher on Electronic Evidence in Cybercrime, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Hungary.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The principle of dual criminality, which requires an act to be criminalized in both the requesting and requested states, is a cornerstone of mutual legal assistance. However, the rise of cybercrime, characterized by its borderless nature and reliance on perishable electronic evidence, has created significant challenges. Divergent legal definitions, procedural variations, and evidentiary standards frequently delay or obstruct cross-border investigations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This paper examines the limitations of dual criminality in cybercrime investigations and explores how technological advancements and inconsistent domestic frameworks affect international cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;A comparative legal analysis is employed, drawing on the legal systems and practices of Rwanda, Germany, Estonia, and Hungary. These jurisdictions were selected to represent non-EU and EU states with diverse legal traditions. The study also evaluates key international instruments, including the Budapest Convention and its Additional Protocols, alongside mechanisms such as the European Investigation Order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion:&lt;/strong&gt; Findings reveal structural and procedural barriers, such as inconsistent offence definitions, jurisdictional conflicts, and inadequate technical capacity, which hinder timely and lawful evidence sharing. These gaps undermine trust and efficiency in cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The paper recommends harmonizing cybercrime definitions, adopting technology-adapted dual criminality assessments, implementing fast-track evidence-sharing mechanisms, and strengthening mutual trust through capacity-building and rights-protection measures. These steps aim to reconcile dual criminality with the urgent need for efficient and rights-compliant international collaboration.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Dual criminality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cybercrime</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Electronic evidence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cross-border cooperation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mutual legal assistance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_106426_deff07b5395ae83a5d28aae48966cded.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Algorithmic dependency: The impact of technological monopoly on developing societies; Case study: The Islamic Republic of Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>663</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>684</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">106427</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2026.409059.1221</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Azam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Molaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of International Relations, Tehran Science and Research University, Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Beyond being a mere technical tool, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a socio-political phenomenon that redefines the identity, social, and political structures of developing nations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;This study analyzes the mechanisms of &quot;algorithmic dependency&quot; and its consequences on national identity, social cohesion, and political development, with a specific focus on Iran.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Employing a qualitative approach and an analytical case study strategy, this research utilizes systematic documentary research. Findings are interpreted through the theoretical lenses of the &quot;Social Construction of Technology&quot; (SCOT) and the &quot;Digital Divide&quot;, ensuring validity via data triangulation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; The results indicate that the algorithmic monopoly of global powers fosters &quot;digital colonialism&quot; and erodes political agency. In Iran, the intersection of cultural biases in imported algorithms with a &quot;structural lag&quot; in governance facilitates &quot;silent othering&quot; and social polarization. Furthermore, by engineering citizen expectations, AI exacerbates the &quot;crisis of efficiency&quot; at sovereign levels.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Safeguarding political independence and social identity requires a transition toward proactive policymaking and indigenous infrastructure. The study concludes that &quot;smart regulation&quot;, developing national AI models, and enhancing algorithmic literacy are essential strategies to strengthen citizen resilience and protect data sovereignty against transnational algorithmic influence.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">algorithmic dependency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Artificial Intelligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Developing Countries</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Digital Divide</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Digital governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">National Resilience</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_106427_2f5d177e4b41f0735878ce5e46217e3e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran on behalf of the "Cyberspace Research Policy Center" and the "UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture: Dual Spacization of the World"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Cyberspace Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5499</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The commodification of attention: Revisiting the harms of the attention economy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>685</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>701</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">102594</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jcss.2025.394786.1145</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Douglas R</FirstName>
					<LastName>Campbell</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Philosophy, Alma College, Alma, Michigan, USA. Alma College, Alma, MI, USA</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The economy wrongly commodifies attention. The commodification is morally objectionable because our attention is not properly subject to market forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;A crucial aim of this article is to broaden the debate about the attention economy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology: &lt;/strong&gt;Conceptual analysis of the attention economy, the right to attention, and the influence of market forces on commodities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion:&lt;/strong&gt; In the first section, I survey the conventional approach to the attention economy, which treats the ethical problems here as instances of questions about the moral limits of markets. I agree that this approach is justified, but I aim to broaden the debate by focusing on whether attention should be commodified at all. In the second section, I argue that attention is not properly subject to market forces. In the third section, I argue that subjecting attention to market forces leads, predictably, to the development and use of technology that violates the right to attention. In the fourth section, I argue that coercive paternalism offers the correct response to these problems and that two other solutions— the reliance on nudges and the reliance on social antibodies— are inferior.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The attention economy is a rights-violating and noxious market. Its wrongful commodification of attention produces a market that does not respect the boundaries between commercialized and non-commercialized spaces.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Attention economy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">attention merchants</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">coercive paternalism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">commodity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">moral limits of markets</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcss.ut.ac.ir/article_102594_4b2b541613c876752c04671c9a893430.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
