Cybernetic semiotics in interactive digital narratives: Toward a semiotic framework for meaning-making in cyberspace with Detroit: Become Human as a case study

Document Type : Original article

Author

Department of Media Arts, Religion and Media Faculty, IRIB University, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Background: Cyberspace has evolved into a vast and intricate cultural ecosystem in which the boundaries between communication, cognition, and creation are constantly being redefined.
Aims: This study examines how digital interactivity restructures the semiotic logic of narrative meaning-making within contemporary cyberspace, using Detroit: Become Human as a paradigmatic case of interactive digital narrative. The research aims to determine how multimodal signs, procedural architectures, and player agency interact to produce dynamic and networked processes of semiosis.
Methodology: Through an integrative semiotic framework, encompassing multimodality, interactive agency, and branching narrative design, the analysis demonstrates that meaning in the game emerges not from fixed textual structures but from recursive exchanges between human interpretation and algorithmic responsiveness.
Findings: The findings reveal that the game’s interactive architecture generates a self-modifying semiotic environment in which choices function as sign-acts that reorganize symbolic patterns across divergent narrative trajectories. This networked mode of signification reflects the broader cultural logic of cyberspace, where meaning is co-created through participatory, decentralized interaction rather than linear authorial transmission.
Conclusion: The study concludes that interactive digital narratives constitute a distinctive semiotic paradigm, one that transforms storytelling into a collaborative and cybernetic process of meaning construction. These insights offer a foundation for future research on how digital media, algorithmic systems, and user participation jointly reshape contemporary forms of narrative and cultural signification.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barthes, R. (1978). Image, Music, Text. Translated by S. Heath. Hill and Wang.
Bizzocchi, J. & Tanenbaum, J. (2011). “Well read: Applying close reading techniques to gameplay experiences”. Well Played 3.0: Video Games, Value and Meaning. ETC Press.
Caracciolo, M. (2022). “Remediating video games in contemporary fiction: Literary form and intermedial transfer”. Games and Culture. 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221119980.
Chandler, D. (2022). Semiotics: The Basics. 4th Edition. Routledge.
Chen, L.; Dowling, D. & Goetz, C. (2023). “At the nexus of ludology and narratology: Advances in reality, based story, driven games”. F1000Research. 12. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.129113.1.
D’Armenio, E. (2024). “From the ontology of video games to the epistemology of digital movements: Towards a semiotics of virtual practices”. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120241263630.
de Paula, B. (2021). “Exploring game grammars: A sociosemiotic account of young people’s game, making practices”. Visual Communication. 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211027214.
Eco, U. (1979). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Indiana University Press.
Hawreliak, J. (2018). Multimodal Semiotics and Rhetoric in Videogames. Routledge.
Koenitz, H. (2023). Understanding Interactive Digital Narrative: Immersive Expressions for a Complex Time. Routledge.
Korte, G. & Ferri, G. (2018). “Research through game design. Interactive stories from a submerged Amsterdam”. Ocula. 19. https://doi.org/10.12977/ocula2018, 14.
Lemke, J.L. (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. Taylor & Francis.
Lister, M.; Dovey, J.; Giddings, S.; Grant, I. & Kelly, K. (2008). New Media: A Critical Introduction. 2nd Edition. Routledge.
Murray, J.H. (2017). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Updated Edition. The MIT Press.
Neiva, E. & Romano, C. (2007). “The semiotic immersion of video games, gaming technology and interactive strategies”. The Public Journal of Semiotics. 1(2). https://journals.lub.lu.se/pjos/article/download/8819/7899.
Peirce, C.S. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.
Scolari, C. (2009). “The sense of the interface: Applying semiotics to HCI research”. Semiotica. 177. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.067.
Simsek, E. & Bozdag, A.A. (2024). “A visual social semiotic investigation into the popularity of Ronaldo and Messi’s chess photo on Instagram: Implications for new media and audience engagement”. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 14(3): e202432. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14603.
Szczęsna, E. (2019). “The semiotics of cyberculture: The example of artistic discourse”. Kultura i Społeczeństwo. 63(3): 45, 62. https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2019.63.3.3.
Thibault, M. (2016). “Lotman and play: For a theory of playfulness based on semiotics of culture”. Sign Systems Studies. 44(3). https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2016.44.3.01.
Vargas-Iglesias, J.J. (2020). “Making sense of genre: The logic of video game genre organization”. Games and Culture. 15(2): 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412017751803.
Volume 10, Issue 2
July 2026
Pages 513-534
  • Receive Date: 15 November 2025
  • Revise Date: 29 November 2025
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2025
  • First Publish Date: 20 January 2026
  • Publish Date: 01 July 2026