Journal of Cyberspace Studies

Journal of Cyberspace Studies

Platform convergence, divergent reported benefits: Persian spiritual content across Kashmiri and Iranian youth

Document Type : Original article

Authors
Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Background: Instagram has become a significant site for the circulation of Persian-language spiritual content.
Aims: This paper asks not simply why such content is consumed, but how its reception differs across three related youth populations: Kashmiri Muslims in Kashmir (K-K), Iranian Muslims in Iran (I-I), and Kashmiri Muslims living in the Iranian diaspora (K-I).

Methodology: Drawing on a structured survey of 225 participants (75 per group, recruited by purposive, convenience and snowball methods), each pattern is read through a specific theoretical lens– cultural hybridity, mediatization, religious-social shaping of technology, plausibility structures, and uses and gratifications– offered as a possible reading, not a tested explanation. The study used a comparative, cross-sectional survey design.

Findings: Near-identical platform preference across the three groups; sharply different usage rhythms, with K-K respondents most often using the platform daily (56.0%) and K-I respondents mostly weekly (61.3%), a pattern that holds within each gender and age band; and lower self-reported benefits among I-I respondents than among either Kashmiri group on all sixteen separately worded outcome measures, where, after adjusting for gender and age, K-K respondents report a benefit 1.7 to 2.5 times as often as I-I respondents and K-I respondents 1.1 to 2.0 times as often (clearly so on ten of the sixteen), while K-K and K-I cannot be distinguished from each other and reported mosque attendance and prayer do not separate the groups clearly. All three groups converge on Instagram as their preferred platform for this content; what varies is how often it is used and what respondents report gaining from it. Because the outcomes are self-reported benefits in non-probability samples recruited through different channels, the paper treats these patterns as descriptive.

Conclusion: The paper closes by considering what a descriptive, non-probability design can and cannot establish, and what an inferential follow-up study would need to test directly.
Keywords
Subjects

Berger, P.L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bunt, G.R. (2009) iMuslims: Rewiring the House of Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Campbell, H.A. (2010) When Religion Meets New Media. London: Routledge.
Campbell, H.A. & Tsuria, R. (eds.) (2022). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Evolvi, G. (2021). “Religion, new media, and digital culture”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Georgiou, M. (2006). Diaspora, Identity and the Media: Diasporic Transnationalism and Mediated Spatialities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Gliem, J.A. & Gliem, R.R. (2003). “Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales”. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Columbus: Ohio State University.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hall, S. (1990). “Cultural identity and diaspora”. in Rutherford, J. (ed.). Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 222-237). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. Abingdon: Routledge.
Human Rights Watch. (2026). “Iran: internet disruptions amid unrest”. New York. https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/03/06/iran-internet-shutdown-violates-rights-escalates-risks-to-civilians.
Katz, E.; Blumler, J.G. & Gurevitch, M. (1974). “Utilization of mass communication by the individual”. in Blumler, J.G. and Katz, E. (eds.). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp. 19-34). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Kazemipur, A. & Goodarzi, M. (2009). “Iranian youth and religion: an empirical study”. Middle East Critique. 18(2): 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436140902989654.
Miaan Group, ASL19, & IODA. (2025). “Iran’s “Stealth Blackout”: A multi-stakeholder analysis of the June 2025 internet shutdown” [Technical report]. Miaan Group. https://miaan.org/report-on-irans-blackout-of-the-global-internet/.
Riffe, D.; Lacy, S.; Watson, B.R. and Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity.
Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). “Making sense of Cronbach's alpha”. International Journal of Medical Education. 2: 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
Tezcur, G.M.; Azadarmaki, T. & Bahar, M. (2006). “Religious participation among Muslims: Iranian exceptionalism”. Critique: Criticlal Middle Eastern Studies. 15(3): 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669920600997035.
Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zakariya, Y.F. (2022). “Cronbach's alpha in mathematics education research: its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability”. Frontiers in Psychology. 13.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430.
Zou, G. (2004). “A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 159(7): 702-706. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh090.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 11 November 2026

  • Receive Date 10 August 2026
  • Revise Date 11 October 2026
  • Accept Date 16 October 2026
  • First Publish Date 11 November 2026
  • Publish Date 11 November 2026