Online Community and Democracy

Document Type : Original article


Professor, Canada Research Chair in Philosophy of Technology, School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Canada


The debate over the contribution of the Internet to democracy is far
from settled. Some point to the empowering effects of online discussion
and fund raising on recent electoral campaigns in the US to argue that
the Internet will restore the public sphere. Others claim that the Internet
is just a virtual mall, a final extension of global capitalism into every
corner of our lives. This paper argues for the democratic thesis with
some qualifications. The most important contribution of the Internet
to democracy is not necessarily its effects on the electoral process but
rather its ability to assemble a public around technical networks that
enroll individuals scattered over wide geographical areas. Medical
patients, video game players, musical performers, and many other
publics have emerged on the Internet with surprising consequences.


Abbate, J. (1994). From Arpanet to Internet: A history of ARPAsponsored
Computer Networks, 1966-1988, unpublished
Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bakardjieva, M. (2012). Subactivism: Lifeworld and politics in
the age of the Internet. In A. Feenberg & N. Friesen (Eds.),
(Re)Inventing the Internet, (85-108). Rotterdam: Sense
Barney, D. (2011). Interviewed by Laureano Ralon for Figure/
Ground Communication April 12th, 2011. Available
(accessed on November 15, 2012).
Bertho, C. (1984). Histoire des telecommunications en France.
Toulouse: Editions Erès.
Borgmann, A. (1992). Crossing the postmodern divide. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Borgmann, A. (2004). Is the Internet the solution to the problem
of community, in A. Feenberg & D. Barney (Eds.), Community
in the digital age. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Dewey, J. (1980). The public and its problems. Denver: Swallow.
Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative modernity: The technical turn
in philosophy and social theory. Los Angeles: University of
California Press.
Feenberg, A. L., Licht, J. M., Kane, K. P., Moran, K., & Smith, R.
A. (1996). The online patient meeting. Journal of the
neurological sciences, 139, 129-131.
Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in
technology and modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Feenberg, A., & Bakardjieva, M. (2004). Consumers or citizens?
The online community debate, in A. Feenberg & D. Barney
(Eds.), Community in the digital age. Lanham: Rowman and
Grimes, S. M. (2006). Online multiplayer games: A virtual space
for intellectual property debates?. New Media & Society,
8(6), 969-990.
Hamilton, E., & Feenberg, A. (2005). The technical codes of online
education. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(2), 104-121.
Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation. Cambridge:MIT Press.
McChesney, R. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication
politics in dubious times. Urbana and Chicago: University of
Illinois Press.
Nara, Y., & Iseda, T. (2004). Ethics on the Internet: A comparative
study of Japan, the United States, and Singapore, in A.
Feenberg & D. Barney (Eds.), Community in the digital age.
Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Noble, D. (consulted Nov. 11, 2006). The truth about the
information highway, Available at
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts
and artefacts, in W. E. Bijker & H. T. Pinch, (Eds.), The social
construction of technological systems. Cambridge, Mass.:
MIT Press.
Slouka, M. (1995). War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech
assault on reality. New York: Basic Books.
Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access
to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.