Document Type : Original article
Author
Professor Emeritus, Broadcast and Electronic Communication Arts, San Francisco State University, United States
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Analog technology is a method of transmitting, processing, or storing information using continuous signals that represent physical quantities. Unlike digital technology, which uses discrete values represented by binary digits (0s and 1s), analog technology relies on continuously varying signals, such as electrical voltages, sound waves, or light intensity, to convey information. Alternatively, we can define the analog as something that is not digital.
In analog systems, the amplitude, frequency, or phase of the signals carries the information being transmitted. For instance, in analog audio technology, sound waves are translated into electrical signals that represent the variations in air pressure over time. These electrical signals can then be amplified and sent through speakers to recreate the original sound (Bowers & Stapleton, 2022). Analog technology was prevalent in various domains before the advent of digital technology. Some common examples include analog telephones, vinyl records, analog cameras, and analog television. In each of these cases, the information was conveyed through continuous variations of physical quantities.
One of the limitations of analog technology is that it is more susceptible to signal degradation and noise interference during transmission or processing. Additionally, analog signals are more challenging to manipulate and store efficiently compared to digital signals, which can be easily processed, compressed, and copied without significant loss of quality. With the rise of digital technology, many analog systems have been replaced by their digital counterparts, thanks to the numerous advantages offered by digital methods, such as higher fidelity, error correction capabilities, and ease of storage and processing.
Despite this transition, analog technology is not entirely obsolete and continues to be used in specific applications where its inherent characteristics are advantageous (Daniel, 2019). For example, analog signals are still utilized in certain audio equipment and analog sensors, especially in scenarios where the continuous nature of analog signals aligns better with the characteristics of the measured data.
On the other hand, digital represents the ultimate binary: off or on, with no intermediary. As I pointed our earlier, Americans spend six hours a day interacting with digital media on their smartphones and tablets. The history of digital technologies is a compelling narrative of technological advancements that have revolutionized the world in profound ways. Beginning with the development of electronic computers in the mid-20th century, the digital revolution has since paved the way for unprecedented changes across various domains. This paper provides a concise historical account of key milestones in the evolution of digital technologies, focusing on pivotal developments and their societal impact.
The roots of digital technologies can be traced back to the 1940s with the introduction of the first electronic general-purpose computer, ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer) (Ceruzzi, 2012). Occupying an entire room and composed of thousands of vacuum tubes, ENIAC laid the foundation for digital data representation using binary digits or bits. This breakthrough marked the inception of modern computing, setting the stage for further advancements.
The 1950s witnessed a significant advancement with the advent of transistors, revolutionizing electronics and making computers smaller, more efficient, and accessible. This pivotal development led to the emergence of mainframe computers in the 1960s, which were extensively utilized by large organizations for data processing and calculations.
A groundbreaking moment in the history of digital technologies occurred in the 1970s with the invention of the microprocessor by Intel. The microprocessor, a tiny integrated circuit housing all the essential components of a central processing unit (CPU), revolutionized computing and facilitated the birth of personal computers (PCs). Companies like Apple and Microsoft emerged during the 1970s and 1980s, pioneering the PC revolution.
The late 20th century witnessed the meteoric rise of the internet and the World Wide Web (WWW). The WWW, developed by Sir Tim Berners-Lee in 1989, transformed communication and information sharing, leading to the global interconnectedness of individuals and organizations (Jacobs, 2023).
In the 21st century, digital technologies continued to evolve rapidly, with the rise of smartphones and mobile computing. These devices enabled internet access and a wide array of functionalities, furthering the integration of technology into everyday life. Additionally, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning brought automation and transformative possibilities across industries. Celebrities are taking advantage of huge opportunities provided by the digital technology (Sarfi et al., 2021), big-tech companies have successfully taken our data and converted it into profit (Zohouri et al., 2021) and counselling services are now available even to the poor (Nosrati et al., 2020).
The relation between digital and analog is a complicated one. In an article, “Being Analog” that was published in a book I edited, The Postmodern Presence, (Berger, 1998) Carol Wilder presents us with a very long chart contrasting many examples of analog and digital bipolarities for us to think about.
ANALOG DIGITAL
Body Mind
Hand Fingers
Life Death
Qualitative Quantitative
Space Time
Yes No
Primary Process Secondary Process
Id Superego
Love Hate
Dreaming Waking
Symbol Syllogism
Icon Explanation
Likeness Name
Picture Word
Pathos Logos
Nonverbal Verbal
Semantics Syntactics
Context Code
Relationship Content
Process Product
Analog Watch Digital Watch
Film Video
Linear Editing Avid
Dial Phone “Touch Tone” Phone
Fax Email
Vinyl Records CDs
Subway Token Metrocard
Hotel Door Key Hotel Door Card
Imperial Measure Metric Measure
Bank Teller ATM
Weeds Flowers
Marijuana Cocaine
Motorcycle Range Rover
Harley Kawasaki
’65 Mustang ’97 Rover
New Yorker People
Big Mac Chicken McNuggets
Ballet Tap Dancing
Elevator Stairs
Valentine’s Day Fourth of July
Swimming Jogging
Bill (Clinton) Hillary (Clinton)
Hot Cool
Greek Latin
Mime Monologue
Coney Island Disneyland
Bruno Magli Shoeprint O.J. DNA Evidence
Rolodex Database
Rheostat Light Switch
“Old” Times Square “New” Times Square
Right Brain Left Brain
Tuning Knobs Buttons
Gears Switches
Classroom Distance Learning
GUI UNIX
Steps to an Pragmatics of
Ecology of Mind Human Communication
Plato Aristotle
Later Wittgenstein Early Wittgenstein
(Philosophical Investigations) (Tractatus)
Actual Virtual
Night Day
Wilder explains how she came up with this list of bipolar opposites (1998: 248-249):
In order to explore the limits of a postmodern multiplicity of meanings, I engaged friends and colleagues to expand upon the standard examples, the result of which is reported here as the dozens of pairs listed.... What struck me was how easy it was for people entirely unfamiliar with the analog/digital concepts to pick up on the gist of this list after being given only a few examples. And yes, while the list itself is “binary,” I was taken with how many stories of the digital age these pairs tell.
Some of these binary pairs are easy to understand, such as analog and digital watches and dial phones and “touch tone” phones, but others are more difficult to comprehend.
It is interesting to think about the cultural significance of some of topics discussed in Wilder’s chart. Here is my analysis of the semiotic, social and psychoanalytic significance of digital watches, adapted from my book Signs in Contemporary Culture (Berger, 1984):
Watches have become an important fashion accessory in recent years, moving beyond their manifest function, which is to tell the time. You can buy perfectly fine Timex or Casio digital watches for around $15 and you can spend tens of thousands of dollars for a Rolex watch, but with the Rolex you are buying status more than just accurate time keeping. Status claims and the psychological rewards of conspicuous consumption, we can say, are the latent functions of purchasing expensive luxury watches.
I noticed that the November 2007 issue of GQ magazine had a large number of watch advertisements—hoping to convince readers to purchase them as Christmas gifts, no doubt. Below I list most of the watches for men that were advertised, or written about, in that issue of the magazine:
Casio G-Shock IWC Schaffhausen
Pulsar Victorinox Chrono Classic XLS
Piaget Guess GC
Nautica Versace DV 1
Oakley Hilfinger
Seiko Velatura Burberry
Seiko Coutura Chanel J12
Rolex Oyster Perpetual Oris Artelier ($1475)
Movado Timex
You can see from this list that there are a large number of companies making watches and that some of these watches are made by companies known for making clothes or perfume—such as Hilfinger, Burberry, and Versace--which have extended their brands into watches.
Most of the advertisements do not indicate the prices of the watches. The advertisements are mostly full-page ones—which is to be expected for expensive objects-- but there are some that are only a half of a page or a third of a page.
Watches are now an important element of consumer culture and have the advantage of being useful, being easy to see (by others) and, when they are in the luxury category of watches, helping their wearers make claims to a high status. Some watches for women have many diamonds or other jewels on their bands or on the watch itself and can be classified as jewelry as well as watches.
The Versace watch was different from all the other watches in that it showed “round cut glittering diamonds and baguette cut sapphires” which would suggest it is for women. I noticed, also, that all of these watches, without exception, had analog displays—that is hour hands, minute hands, and seconds hands.
That would suggest that these watches are mechanical (some are quartz) and thus, technologically speaking, throwbacks to earlier times. Watches such as these can be seen as art objects and reflect a different sensibility from digital watches. Mechanical watches have been supplanted by digital watches, the watches worn now by most people.
In my book, Signs in Contemporary Culture: An Introduction to Semiotics (2nd edition), I have a short chapter titled “Eight Hypotheses on the Significance of Digital Watches.” The chapter uses semiotic theory, sociological theory, psychoanalytic theory, and Marxist theory to speculate about what digital watches tell us about people who wear these watches and about American society.
I chose the following two hypotheses because I thought they offered some interesting insights into the cultural impact of these watches and what they reflect about modern society. I offer my first hypothesis and my explanation for my reasoning below.
I argue that the digitalization of American society (and the rest of the world as well) reflects an increasing sense of alienation, in that digital watches generate, with incredible accuracy, discrete moments in time, but they are not relational.
Along with alienation, I suggest that these watches signify the domination of the electronic over the mechanical. Indeed, if you look at people walking down the street, you will find that many, if not most of them, are wearing digital watches, MP3 players and are carrying cell phones, reflecting the triumph of the electronic, and the digital version of the electronic, in modern life. I discuss this in my second hypothesis.
My other six hypotheses about the significance of digital watches follow, but without the explanations I offered in the book:
6.The dominance of the digital watch shows the power of fashion.
7.Digital watches are magical toys.
It would be an interesting exercise for readers of this book to try and figure out my reasoning in the hypotheses I’ve just listed. It also is worth thinking about other hypotheses about digital watches that might be entertained.
In his book The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on New Media, the editor, Peter Lunenfeld, explains how digital differs from analog. He writes (1999: xv-xvi):
Digital systems to not use continuously variable representational relationships. Instead, they translate all input into binary structures of 0s and 1s, which can then be stored, transferred, or manipulated at the level of numbers or “digits” (so called because etymologically the word descends from the digits on our hands with we count out those numbers). Thus, a phone call on a digital system will be encoded as a series of 0s and 1s and sent over the wires as binary information to be reinterpreted as speech at the other end. The digital photograph, rather than being a series of tonally continuous pigmented dots, is instead composed of pixels, a grid of cells that have precise numerical attributes associated with them, a series of steps rather than a continuous slope.
The digital watch was, it turns out, a harbinger of the incredible changes that other digital devices such as cell phones, tablets, MP3 players, digital cameras, computers and digital television receivers, were to unleash on society. Because they are so efficient, digital devices now dominate the devices that most people use in their everyday lives.